By combining their production, processing, and marketing capabilities, the new organization is ideally positioned to strengthen the supply of French-grown frozen vegetables, while reinforcing the economic and agricultural weight of the Brittany region.

This transaction was successfully completed after clearance was obtained from the antitrust authorities. 

Key figures:

• 900 employees

• 4 sites in Brittany, France

• Marketed products: frozen vegetables, gratins, ready meals, soups, purées, fruit…

• Markets: retail, food service, freezer centers, export

• Sales in the Frozen Division 80 countries (EU, USA, Canada….)

This transaction, which involved many different aspects, was made supporting a very long-standing client of our firm, and illustrates of ADVANT Altana’s ability to manage complex issues in a cross-border environment.

The ADVANT Altana team was led by Jean-Nicolas Soret (partner), Alexandra Ferrier and Victoire Denis Madelin (associates).

The Büter Group comprises German and Dutch (production) companies and is one of Europe's leading companies in the hydraulics industry. Founded in 1965, the family-owned company is headquartered in Emmen (NL) and has production facilities in Haren and Meppen (DE). It employs around 550 people. Over the past six decades, the family-owned company has developed numerous patents and utility models in cylinder and lifting technology and is now one of the technological market leaders in the industry.

NPM Capital, part of the family-owned SHV Group, is an investment partner based in the Benelux countries that focuses on long-term partnerships with family-owned and entrepreneurially managed companies. As part of the transaction, NPM Capital is acquiring the entire group of companies, including the two German subsidiaries Büter Hebetechnik GmbH and Büter Maschinenfabrik GmbH.

By joining forces with NPM Capital, Büter Group is well positioned to accelerate its growth strategy and continue to invest in technological innovation and international expansion. Under the new ownership, Büter Group will continue to operate independently.

Regarding the sale of the Dutch entities, the international law firm Houthoff acted on ADVANT Beiten's recommendation. Taurus Corporate was involved as an M&A advisor. The acquisition is still subject to the usual regulatory and antitrust approvals. The parties have agreed not to disclose the transaction volume. 

Advisors to the shareholders of Büter Group:
ADVANT Beiten: Dr Guido Krüger (Corporate Succession/Taxes), Prof Dr Hans-Josef Vogel (M&A, both lead partners), Julian Krause (Corporate Succession/M&A), Dr Magdalena Rindermann-Haugwitz (Corporate/M&A), Volker Küpper (Taxes), Thomas Herten (Real Estate), Dr Andreas Imping, Anna Kubitz (both Labour Law, all Dusseldorf), Christoph Heinrich (Antitrust Law, Munich) and Maximilian Steffen (Taxes, Hamburg).

PR
Frauke Reuther
Manager Kommunikation
ADVANT Beiten
+49 (69) 75 60 95 - 570
frauke.reuther@advant-beiten.com

Beyond broader trade issues, the Joint Statement specifically addresses tariffs, in line with a new protectionist US trade policy. 

Following months of what the EU expected to be a negotiation on an agreement on customs duties and related issues, the EU and the USA have published the Joint Statement, which is not a legally binding instrument, but a political document outlining the commitments of both parties on the new parameters of their trade relationships.

With specific respect to tariffs, the US will apply to the majority of EU products the higher between:

• the current US Most Favoured Nation (MFN) tariff rate; and 

• a tariff rate of 15%.

This entails that EU products already subject to MFN tariffs equal or higher than 15% will not be subject to the new tariffs announced by the US administration. This a better outcome than what the UK achieved

In addition, as from 1 September 2025, the US commits to apply only the MFN tariff to the following EU products: unavailable natural resources, aircraft and aircraft parts, generic pharmaceuticals and their ingredients and chemical precursors. The parties will consider other sectors and products for inclusion in the list of products for which only the MFN tariffs would apply.

For other products – those subject to US Section 232 of the of the Trade Expansion of 1962 (including cars, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber) – the total tariffs will be capped at 15% (after the EU eliminates its own tariffs on US industrial goods and provide preferential market access for a wide range of US seafood and agricultural goods); this may result in a reduction, for these products, of the overall tariffs currently in place.

As for steel and aluminium, the framework remains undefined. The parties agreed in principle to cooperate on protective measures against global overcapacity and to develop secure supply chains, possibly through Tariff Rate Quota (TRQ) solutions. However, previous attempts to resolve tariff issues related to aluminium and steel remained futile.

Some of these tariffs may be impacted by the recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; pending appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, the Appeals Court has left the tariffs in place until October 14. Whether the U.S. Supreme Court sides with the Administration argument, that the imposition of broad tariffs is in keeping with the powers granted through the “International Emergency Economic Powers Act” or goes beyond that authority remains to be seen.

It should also be noted that the de-minimis rule for products sold into the U.S. at up to US$ 800 via parcels has been scrapped. This has led to a halt on shipping such products by the big European logistics companies. The repercussions on Chinese direct sales enterprises, such as Shein and Temu will be considerable and also be felt with European business in the direct sales area. To put the importance of this into context: the US Customs and Border Patrol estimates that in the last fiscal year, 1.36 billion packages were shipped to the U.S.

The Italian Government, while welcoming the Joint Statement, wishes o broaden the preferential treatments to sectors currently excluded, such as food and wine and to reach an agreement on steel and aluminium.

Apart from agriculture and wine, the Italian industry (in particular in the fashion and luxury, as well as the furniture and machinery sector) emphasize that for safeguarding the “Made in Italy” supply chains, broader exemptions or mitigating measures. are necessary. 

The German government expressed a cautious but overall positive view, stating that it is a successful effort to avert a damaging trade conflict that would have severely impacted the German export-oriented economy. Needless to say, German industry leaders have warned that even the reduced 15% tariffs on EU exports to the US will have a significant negative impact on Germany's export-driven industries, from automotive to chemical to steel products.

French politicians have roundly criticized the Joint Statement without however convincingly demonstrating that they would have achieved a better result than the EU Commission, supported by the Member States. The French President has called on the EU to mobilize all of its instruments, including anti-coercion, which is a negotiation tool but also provides for severe mechanisms to be used as a retaliatory measure, to reach a satisfactory deal.

French industry representatives have also urged the French Government and the European Commission to secure broader exemptions, namely for the wine and spirits or the luxury sectors, but overall deplore the content of the Joint Statement, which they find too unbalanced. It should however be noted that the EU did not give in on reducing non-tariff barriers. Although the wording of the Joint Statement is very vague and further development should be monitored, the agreement does not seem to provide for any modification of the EU legislative framework.

The Spanish prime minister recently said that he would support the trade agreement, "but I do so without any enthusiasm". The Spanish industries, notable those producing steel, called for clarity on critical details of the Joint Statement, especially concerning the continuing 50% U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, pending quota arrangements. They called for temporary aid for sectors most affected, including vehicles and steel

In conclusion, considering the non-binding nature of the Joint Statement and the need for further legal implementation, future developments should be closely monitored. In the meantime, EU companies exporting to the US – particularly French, German and Italian businesses, as three of the largest European exporters to the US – are advised to proactively review their cross-border commercial agreements, paying careful attention to clauses on pricing, allocation of duties, force majeure, hardship, and supply chain resilience, in order to mitigate risks, preserve margins, and prevent disputes. Such clauses could also be reviewed to include in their definition significant changes in international trade law.

Prof. Dr Rainer Bierwagen
Filippo Federici
Simone Gaggero
Morgane Gandaubert
Paolio Gallarati
Marie Hindré
Prof. Dr Hans-Josef Vogel

The financing of the EU's tasks must be secured in the long term and requires comprehensive budget planning. The basis of this budget planning is the so-called "Multiannual Financial Framework“, and the next one must be adopted unanimously by the Member States for the years 2028 to 2034 on a proposal from the European Commission with the consent of the European Parliament. The Commission presented its draft on July 16, 2025, and it is quite ambitious. But what exactly is the "Multiannual Financial Framework"? Which changes does it make compared to the previous funding period? What happens next?

What is the "Multiannual Financial Framework"?

Based on Art. 312 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the "Multiannual Financial Framework" (MFF), which is the responsibility of the European Commission, covers the EU's budget planning for at least five – usually seven – years. It determines the financial scope of the annual EU budget by setting binding ceilings. The focus is always on promoting European cooperation, particularly in terms of growth and competitiveness. Long-term budget planning enables investment projects to be aligned over several years and thus designed more efficiently. Variable elements of the MFF allow a flexible response to crises and emergencies such as natural disasters. Moreover, it enables financial resources to be deployed quickly and precisely.

In addition to the MFF, the EU also has subsidiary budgets. The most prominent example of this is NextGenerationEU (NGEU). This is a temporary recovery program that was launched in 2020 to deal with the economic and social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. With a volume of more than EUR 800 billion, NGEU aims to finance economic recovery in the EU and promote investment.

There are also other budgets outside the traditional financial framework, such as the European Peace Facility (EFF). The facility was set up for the period 2021-2027 with a volume of EUR 5.69 billion and serves to support countries affected by military conflicts.

What are the main innovations of the MFF 2028-2034?

A – Increasing the budget and new sources of revenue

The Commission wants to significantly increase the budget. The current MFF 2021-2027 has a total volume of around EUR 1,211 billion, which corresponds to around 1.11% of the gross national income (GNI) of the EU-27. In addition, there are funds from the "Next Generation EU" reconstruction program amounting to around EUR 800 billion.

The current EU budget, including NGEU funds, therefore amounts to around EUR 285 billion per year. In comparison, the German federal budget alone is already around EUR 450 billion, i. e. almost twice as much.

The European Commission considers the current budget volume for the future MFF 2028-2034 to be insufficient, particularly regarding the need to overcome global instabilities and to finance climate protection and biodiversity. The European Commission wants to invest EUR 2,000 billion to future-proof the EU. "The next Multiannual Financial Framework is the most ambitious we have ever proposed. It is more strategic, more flexible, more transparent", says European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. But where will this funding come from?

To keep the Member States' national contributions stable, the European Commission is trying to tap into new own resources. At present, the fulfilment of EU tasks is largely financed by contributions from the Member States, and they would rather "transfer less to Brussels" than more. On the one hand, ecological levies are proposed, i. e. revenues from the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) are to be used permanently as own resources, with 30 % of ETS revenues flowing into the EU budget in addition to the proceeds from the CBAM. On the other hand, revenue is to be generated from the taxation of multinational corporations: With the planned taxation of corporate profits in the EU through the BEFIT (Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation) instrument as well as revenue from the OECD-driven Pillar One of the global minimum tax system.

B – Changes

The heart of the new MFF are the national and regional partnership plans, which shall form the basis for investments and reforms. The European Commission would like to invest EUR 865 billion just for this.

In addition, the European Commission intends to modernize the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and adapt it to new ecological and social requirements. A further EUR 300 billion has been earmarked as income support for farmers, which corresponds to double the amount of the agricultural reserve compared to the previous MFF.

In addition, programmes to reduce economic and territorial disparities between regions should be more efficient and customs and excise duties should be optimized.

Another important proposal is the establishment of a European Competitiveness Fund with almost EUR 410 billion. This fund bundles up to 14 previously separate programmes, including innovation, digitalization, climate protection, health and defence, into a single, thematically focused fund. The aim is to promote strategic investments in key technologies, drive forward industrial decarbonization and strengthen Europe's global competitiveness.

What criticism is there of the planned changes to the MFF 2028-2034?

The European Commission's draft has not met with a positive response everywhere. The European Parliament has already rejected the European Competitiveness Fund proposed by the European Commission as inadequate. Large funds are considered unsuitable for guaranteeing parliamentary control. It also criticizes the model of a national plan per member state ("single plan"), as is practiced with the Recovery and Resilience Facility. The European Parliament will not accept any restriction of its duty of oversight and democratic control over EU funds. Instead, it is calling for a differentiated structure with strong parliamentary control and the involvement of regional and local authorities.

Several member states also reject a significant increase in the EU budget. If this were to be accompanied by an increase in the expenditure ceiling above the current level of 1 % of GNI, which in turn is criticized by the European Parliament and the European Commission. "Frugal" states such as Germany have already spoken out against an increase in the EU budget. France has even announced its intention to cut payments to the EU budget in 2026.

Many member states are sceptical about new, mandatory own resources and additional financial burdens that go beyond management or structural reforms. Regardless of the Commission's proposals for new financing instruments, differences remain, for example regarding the integration of new thematic areas or centralized control.

How will defence be financed?

There is overwhelming consensus on increasing the defence budget. The financing of defence is based on the European Defence Fund (EDF). This is the central EU instrument for promoting research, development and joint procurement of modern defence technologies. For the current period 2021-2027, the fund has a budget of EUR 7.3 billion at its disposal. Given the current geopolitical situation, the European Commission has invested EUR 910 million in strengthening the innovative and interoperable defence industry in Europe this year. The European Commission's proposal provides for a special mechanism with a financial impact of almost EUR 400 billion to deal with serious crises. EUR 131 billion is to be invested from the Competitiveness Fund in the areas of defence and space. A further EUR 100 billion is earmarked for Ukraine's recovery and resilience. 

In addition to the EDF, the European Commission is planning a comprehensive rearmament as part of its "ReArm Europe" initiative. To this end, it plans to borrow EUR 150 billion through capital market bonds. This should enable rapid and targeted investments without placing an undue burden on national budgets. Over the next four years, around EUR 800 billion will be mobilized, a large part of which is to be covered by an increase in national defence spending by the member states of 1.5 % of GDP.

Further considerations concern the establishment of a so-called "rearmament bank", which is supported by EU member states as well as foreign partners such as the USA and the UK, to simplify and bundle financing for defence technologies. This bank would issue triple-A bonds backed by the shareholder states and thus mobilize additional funds without increasing the debt levels of the member states.

What happens next?

The proposal for the 2028-2034 MFF submitted by the European Commission on 16 July 2025 will be discussed over the next two years. The new MFF must be adopted unanimously in the Council and by simple majority in the European Parliament.

How the European Commission will manage the balancing act between future-orientated policy with new tasks and expenditure desired by the European Parliament and the savings wishes of the Member States cannot be predicted. So far, negotiations have been characterised by the paradox that every Member State wants to get more out than it pays in. Furthermore, in the EU as elsewhere, regrettably, different points are being linked together: For example, the approval of EU sanctions with commitments in favour of individual EU Member States, as in the recent case of Slovakia's delayed approval of the 18th sanctions package against Russia. In the next two years, there will certainly be tough disputes over the proposal. Besides, the MFF 2028-2034 will certainly look different from what was proposed.

Gábor Báthory
Prof. Dr. Rainer Bierwagen
Christian Hipp
Dr. Dietmar O. Reich

Sources

Proposal of the European Commission

https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/eu-budget/long-term-eu-budget/eu-budget-2028-2034_en

Parliament's priorities for the Multiannual Financial Framework from 2028 onwards | News | European Parliament

Budget proposal "simply not enough", say MEPs | News | European Parliament

Example comments from Baden-Württemberg

https://stm.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/service/presse/pressemitteilung/pid/vorschlag-der-eu-kommission-fuer-mehrjaehrigen-finanzrahmen 

welcome to the June issue of ADVANT Beiten's International Briefing.

Germany remains one of the world’s most attractive destinations for foreign direct investments. This reputation is well-deserved, as the country offers a stable legal environment, a highly skilled workforce, and a dynamic industrial landscape, all of which create a robust foundation for successful business ventures. In ADVANT Beiten's newly released guide "Investing in Germany" our experts provide a comprehensive overview of the legal framework for foreign investments in Germany - practical, understandable and with extensive experience in the field of foreign direct investments.

This year our Beijing office proudly celebrates its 30^th anniversary. We are delighted to share with you an insightful interview with our Beijing team of Susanne Rademacher, Dr Jenna Wang-Metzner, and Lelu Li, highlighting their dedication and three decades expertise in the field of the inbound and outbound investments in China.

In this issue we will also highlight interesting developments in the European and German legal landscape, invite you to meet us at international events, and tell you about our recent deals.

You can find the newsletter by clicking here.

Kind regards,

Dr Barbara Mayer
Prof. Dr Hans-Josef Vogel
Dr Christian von Wistinghausen
Moritz Kopp

Moosmann GmbH & Co. KG based in Ravensburg is a family-run company with a focus on sustainable logistics solutions and customised packaging systems for industry and trade. The Moosmann Group is pursuing a long-term growth strategy through targeted investments in innovative technologies.

Verpackungs- u. Lagertechnik Ulm GmbH is an established provider of modular storage, transport and order picking systems for industry, trade and logistics providers. The company based in Ulm has a strong market presence in the DACH region and is well known for its solutions for increasing efficiency in intralogistics. The integration into the Moosmann Group opens up new development prospects for both companies - particularly in the areas of digitalization, automation and sustainable material development.

Advisors to Moosmann GmbH & Co. KG:
ADVANT Beiten: Gerhard Manz (Freiburg), Christian Burmeister (Freiburg and Berlin, both lead partners in charge), Dr Christian Osbahr (Freiburg, all Corporate/M&A).

Public Relations

Frauke Reuther
Manager Kommunikation
ADVANT Beiten
+49 (69) 75 60 95 - 570
frauke.reuther@advant-beiten.com

CATT operates its first plant outside China in Arnstadt, Thuringia. With 1,700 employees, the plant is the largest foreign subsidiary of the battery manufacturer. Existing customers in Germany include companies such as BMW and Mercedes-Benz. In addition to the site in Germany, the expansion plans focus in particular on the sites in Hungary and Spain.

CATL has made a profit of approx. 4.6 billion dollars with the stock exchange listing in Hong Kong. The final price per share was set at 263 Hong Kong dollars, this corresponds to the maximum offer price. The scope of CATL's transaction could increase to 5.3 billion dollars, if a so-called greenshoe option results in the sale of a further 17.7 million shares. The fresh capital will be used in particular to finance CATL's further expansion into Europe. 

CATL Advisor - as a German Legal Counsel:

ADVANT Beiten: Dr Dirk Tuttlies (in charge; Capital Market Law), Dr Christian von Wistinghausen (in charge; Due Diligence), Tassilo Klesen, Danah El-Ismail, Simone Schmatz, Christian Burmeister, Lelu Li, Damien Heinrich, Robert Schmid (all Corporate/M&A), Katrin Lüdtke, Korbinian Goll (Public Law).

Public Relations

Frauke Reuther
Communications Manager
ADVANT Beiten
+49 (69) 75 60 95 - 570
frauke.reuther@advant-beiten.com

These tariffs affect all sectors, but one of the most affected in Europe is the automobile sector, particularly in Germany: cars will now be taxed at 25%. The most affected sector in France are aeronautics, with 7.9 billion euros of exports in 2023, pharmaceuticals with 4.1 billion euros in 2023 and alcohol (especially wine) with 3,9 billion.

In addition, differentiated and higher tariff rates will apply on goods from the French overseas territories: Guadeloupe, Mayotte, Guyane and Martinique will be subject to a 10% tax in addition to the 20% levied on the rest of France, while Réunion will be subject to a total tax of 37%. Tariffs of 50% will be imposed on products from Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon and 10% on those from French Polynesia, as these islands have not been considered part of the EU by Trump.

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she was ready to negotiate but was also ready for confrontation if necessary to assert the EU's interests and values. She said that the Commission is working on countermeasures. Several European heads of state are also working on measures to be adopted.

ADVANT has a team of international trade and national security attorneys, and government relations professionals ready to help European companies. Our dedicated team has decades of experience supporting clients across a range of industries – ranging from steel, chemical, rubber, mining, and agricultural products.

Prof. Dr Rainer Bierwagen
Christian Hipp
Dr Dietmar Reich
Gábor Báthory

The new reality - defence technology as a growth market

The global political situation has escalated dramatically in recent years. With the ongoing war in Ukraine, increasing tensions in various regions of the world and general uncertainty, we are experiencing a historic turning point. The much-cited "turning point" has long since become a reality - and with it, considerable sums are flowing into defence.

This opens up completely new perspectives: Companies that previously only manufactured civilian products are now seriously considering whether and how they can make their technologies and expertise usable for the defence sector. For medium-sized companies with technological expertise in particular, the question arises: What funding opportunities are there for entering the defence technology sector?

Here is an up-to-date overview of the most important programmes and instruments that will be available at the beginning of 2025:

European Funding Opportunities

European Defence Fund (EDF) - the flagship of EU funding

The European Defence Fund (EDF) will provide around 1.065 billion euros for defence research and development in 2025. Particularly interesting for newcomers: 4% of the budget is reserved for "disruptive" technologies and a further 6% for innovative projects focussing on SMEs.

The current 2025 work programme comprises 33 topics in nine tenders - from ground combat and cyber defence to environmentally friendly technologies. The focus is on projects such as cyber defence, marine and underwater capabilities and sensor systems.

Funding conditions in brief:

• Applications must generally be submitted by consortia of at least three independent organisations from three EU Member States
• Two partners from two countries are sufficient for disruptive technology projects
• Only companies/organisations based in the EU or Norway are eligible for funding
• Depending on the project type, the funding rate is up to 100% (especially for pure research)
• There are bonus points for the participation of SMEs

Important for your planning: The tenders have been running since mid-February 2025 and the deadline for submitting project applications is 16 October 2025.

Defence Equity Facility – capital for innovative startups

Another exciting opportunity is the Defence Equity Facility (DEF) which was launched at the beginning of 2024. This venture capital fund has a volume of 175 million euros and seeks to mobilise private venture capital for defence technology innovations with dual-use potential.

The DEF does not invest directly in companies, but in specialised private funds which in turn invest in security and defence companies. It is planned to initiate investments of up to 500 million euros in defence-related startups and SMEs by 2027.

The DEF could facilitate access to urgently needed growth capital, especially for innovative startups that develop new technologies such as AI, sensor technology or cyber security.

German Funding Opportunities

Dual-use potential in civil innovation programmes

An approach that is often neglected or ignored is to apply the classic innovation funding programmes such as ZIM (Central Innovation Programme for SMEs) or KMU-innovativ. Although these programmes are primarily civilian in nature, they can also be relevant for defence technology under certain circumstances.

The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy is generally open to all technologies when it comes to ZIM. Defence technology companies can also receive ZIM grants, provided the project content can be used for civilian purposes - such as new material technologies, electronics or AI applications that could later be used for military purposes.

The same applies to BMBF programmes such as KMU-innovativ which offer calls for tenders in fields such as AI, electronics or security technologies. Although direct defence topics are excluded, security and defence as an area of application can benefit indirectly.

Cyber Innovation Hub of the Bundeswehr (German armed forces)

The Cyber Innovation Hub of the Bundeswehr (CIHBw) serves as an interface between the start-up scene and the Bundeswehr. It was launched as a pilot project to bring military users together with civilian innovations.

The CIHBw strengthened its partnerships in 2025. Particularly noteworthy is the strategic partnership concluded with the University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich on 11 February 2025. This alliance aims to closely link research and innovation with the requirements of the troops.

The hub also offers support for intrapreneurship and regularly organises innovation challenges - an exciting opportunity for innovative companies to develop their solutions directly with the Bundeswehr.

Strategic Orientation - What Is Being Promoted?

Anyone wishing to enter the defence sector should be guided by the National Security and Defence Industrial Strategy adopted in December 2024. This strategy defines clear key technologies that are prioritised for future funding:

• IT and communication technologies for military purposes
• Artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous systems
• Naval shipbuilding
• Government shipbuilding
• Protected/armoured vehicles
• Sensors (reconnaissance, radar, optoelectronics)
• Protection technologies and electromagnetic combat

Other critical areas include quantum technologies, missiles and air defence, space technologies, munitions and unmanned systems (unmanned aerial vehicles).

Projects that fall into these categories have a much better chance of receiving funding and being awarded long-term contracts.

Practical Tips for Beginners

As experienced lawyers with a view to funding practice, we would like to give you some practical tips:

1. Use existing expertise: Cooperate with established companies in the defence industry to benefit from their experience.
2. Think dual-use: Develop technologies that can be used for both civil and military purposes. This strategy maximises your funding opportunities.
3. Form consortia: Cooperation with partners from other EU countries is essential for the European Defence Fund. Establish networks at an early stage.
4. Pay attention to safety aspects: The defence industry is subject to special security requirements. Make sure that your company fulfils the necessary requirements.
5. Plan early: The application deadlines are often long and the procedures complex. Start preparing at least six months before the deadline.

Conclusion - A Market in Transition

The current global political situation has caused fundamental changes in the defence sector. The massive investment in European security is creating completely new business opportunities - even for companies that were previously active in other areas.

The funding programmes presented offer various entry options. The combination of European funds (EVF) for research and development with national programmes for concrete implementation is particularly promising.

Those who act strategically now and adapt their civil expertise to the defence sector can benefit from this growth market in the long term.

Do you have questions about funding for defence technologies or need support with your application? Contact us - we will be pleased to help you!

Dennis Hillemann
Johannes Voß-Lünemann